View Single Post
      01-02-2020, 10:11 AM   #29
polychromatic
Second Lieutenant
polychromatic's Avatar
United_States
135
Rep
233
Posts

Drives: E30, E44, E61, E07
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Central No. America

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TurtleBoy View Post
In low beam the adaptive LEDs are brighter and project further than the Laser Lights. That is a big reason they are rated poor by the IIHS due to the glare they create.

https://www.iihs.org/ratings/vehicle...019#headlights
Say what

What about in ‘High Beam”? Same story? One of the main reasons for ordering an G05 was for the lights. Getting older and drive long trips on secondary roads a lot, so if the Laser Light option was a bad idea, then I may have to cancel out.


Quote:
Originally Posted by LexxM3 View Post
I don't know for a fact, but I *believe* that anti-dazzle decode removal (ie coding anti-dazzle back on) on the US/Canada neutered laser lights is NOT the same thing as getting the neutered laser lights to proper Euro spec. I have not yet seen a discussion about coding to Euro spec. Nonetheless, anti-dazzle is an awesome system, works very well, and should really be part of every laser lights equipped G05 X5, so that coding is still worth it.
Agreed, I’m good with AD feature, I just want the full ROW LED/Laser output in high beam.
Appreciate 0