Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Bread
A little unfair as the retail price was $178k, and only clowns were paying a markup. It's also not like GT500's didn't have dealer markups too. The smaller quantity of the RS is going to work in its favor here.
Does the GT500 have potentially strong value retention? Yes. Was a jab on the GT3 RS well placed here? No, no it was not.
|
well for this scenario i'm assuming could get one new without markup. And yes if you spec the needed options the GT3RS was right around 200k. who would spec a gt3 without carbon ceramics? who would spec a gt500 without the 20k carbon kit ?
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...-track-review/ (price as tested $195000)
i still think overall the mustang would save you more after you sell it 3-5 years later. especially when you factor in going to the track, oil changes, insurance, property tax, sales tax, brake pads. Just saying its a cheaper way to get a similar lap time to a gt3rs and its a straight line monster.
But i agree i'd take the GT3RS all day over any mustang.