View Single Post
      01-23-2020, 01:46 PM   #57
Red Bread
Major General
United_States
4463
Rep
9,160
Posts

Drives: Smog machines
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Austin, TX

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pennsiveguy View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rmtt View Post
I started to say something, but stopped.

Incidentally and you probably already know this since you have owned some, my MT C6 has averaged about 16% loss through the drive-train stock and through each mod. Tested with numerous dynos and it's almost the same every time.

My old C6Z was the same. Stock rwhp accounting for 16% loss came out at around 507hp at the crank.

That's pretty good considering some of the cars I have owned. Advertised HP can be all over the board. My E46 M3 MT had around a 21% loss.

I once had a new 2004 Terminator that was advertised at 390/390 at the crank. Within a week I had it tested on a dyno and it almost put that exact number down to the rear wheel. So it was underrated big time.
Did you arrive at that 16% loss factor by comparing engine dyno vs. chassis dyno? Just curious.
Further it seems like 15% still applies to manuals, but the two pedal set is seeing something in the 8-10% range these days.
Appreciate 1
Rmtt8208.00