View Single Post
      01-01-2020, 08:26 AM   #41
chassis
Colonel
chassis's Avatar
6532
Rep
2,308
Posts

Drives: 9Y0 Cayenne S
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Einbahnstraße

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
I still don't see who is harmed by the status quo. The Federal government? State government? The consumer? An investor? Is a Federal, state or local statute being violated? The link in the OP does not give the basis for an objection from the SEC.

The only question I see here is whether or not the status quo affects share price, and therefore potentially harming an investor. But an institutional investor will understand how the business fundamentals work, including punching, and I argue that the institutional investor would not be affected by the status quo.

So the only party that might be harmed is the unsophisticated retail investor. I argue that the status quo has an immaterial impact on this investor segment.

p.s. I drove a service loaner this week from another manufacturer. "Dealer New" plate, state of Indiana.

Last edited by chassis; 01-01-2020 at 06:12 PM..
Appreciate 0