[Miko M]

Originally Posted by SM2

Twinning, great combo!

Nice
Wisconsin too

[psuibmw]

Originally Posted by Penguino

No. Just no.

That's what's called diversity not all of us has to like the same thing

[xjz]

Originally Posted by GodfatherNiko

The X6 is to rear ends what the leaked new 4er is to front ends.

I hear ya, and the others who say this rear end missed the mark.

I think the problem is that it's concave where the bumper should actually protrude outward. That would make it a bit more manly (yes, I said that. I'm sure the PC police will be all over me now. ). My quick render of a proper rear bumper...

[psuibmw]

Originally Posted by xjz

I hear ya, and the others who say this rear end missed the mark.

I think the problem is that it's concave where the bumper should actually protrude outward. That would make it a bit more manly (yes, I said that. I'm sure the PC police will be all over me now. ). My quick render of a proper rear bumper...

This looks as if it has a trunk

[xjz]

Originally Posted by psuibmw

This looks as if it has a trunk

Trunks are sportier.

[SabineBimmer]

The more I study that back-end, the more I think they really had no choice in those rear accents that just sort of stick out. By staying with the rear-end lighting design, that other BMWs have gone towards, they're threatening leaving a whole lot of dead space. That said, while considering how they did this I've come to the conclusion that it's not the best per se, but it sure as Hell could have been a lot worse.