|
|
|
|
|
|
BMW Garage | BMW Meets | Register | Today's Posts | Search |
|
BMW 3-Series (E90 E92) Forum
>
Normal Max Boost
|
|
04-19-2016, 06:53 AM | #1 |
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
Normal Max Boost
I know this has been addressed before, but I would be curious to know how much max boost folks are generating from the turbos. According to torque pro I am maxing out at 26.5. My Snow boost gauge is closer to 30 psi. This is with 50/50 water meth, Forge charge pipe and ChipExpress tuning box.
|
04-19-2016, 07:54 AM | #2 | |
Major
307
Rep 1,146
Posts
Drives: F10 550i
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston, TX
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2020 BMW M340i [0.00]
2019 RAM 3500 [0.00] 2020 BMW X3 [0.00] 2016 BMW 550i [0.00] 2000 Ford F450 7.3l ... [0.00] |
Quote:
Torque and boost gauges are notoriously inaccurate. Most people calibrate a mechanical boost gauge to get an accurate read. The stock car peaks at 26.8 but it may do less depending on temperature as the car isn't running to a target boost pressure so much as a target mass air flow. It will vary turbo output to a limit to reach targets maf. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 07:57 AM | #3 |
Colonel
614
Rep 2,410
Posts |
Is this with DWR's Torque PID's, or with Torque's approximation where it uses your VE estimate, engine displacement and MAF to calculate a boost number?
__________________
2011 335d 11.68 @ 125.71 mph 1/4 mile NHRA certified track
Ram Cummins with lots-o-mods |
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 07:18 PM | #4 |
First Lieutenant
95
Rep 308
Posts
Drives: 2011 335d M-Sport, Nav/Blinds
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Arlington, TX
|
|
Appreciate
1
|
04-19-2016, 11:05 PM | #5 | |
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2016, 11:08 PM | #6 | ||
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 07:07 AM | #7 |
First Lieutenant
102
Rep 320
Posts |
Chief, I don't see how spraying water/meth in the intake affects boost pressure at all. Boost is controlled by a MAF sensor (and limited by a pressure sensor) in the intake. If you do anything to change the pressure there, the car will compensate by regulating the wastegate. Spraying w/m in the intake downstream of the MAF sensor will, however, make the air charge denser. Putting more oxygen molecules in the cylinder will allow the tuner to put more diesel molecules in there, as well, since he will be targeting an air/fuel ratio.
If you were to look at an instant in time at the w/m injection point, you might find a static pressure of 25 psi (boost already generated, MAF already reported) in warm, dry air. If you now introduce some w/m, you have added mass and therefore pressure. If the w/m evaporates, you have lowered density at the same mass and volume, so pressure again increases. But you have also lowered the temperature. P1 x V1 / T1 = P2 x V2 / T2. What's the net effect? You won't know without knowing the amount of w/m mix (and the ratio) that evaporates and how much it drops the temperature. Dynamically, this air column can expand or collapse back through the turbo and MAF sensor, so if the air column expands, the MAF will report lower readings and cause the system to raise the target boost (up to its programmed limit pressure). The opposite is true if the air column shrinks. In this MAF-controlled scenario, you would want the column to expand for maximum power. So you would want to minimize evaporation and temperature reduction (of the w/m) in the intake. You want the evaporation to occur in the cylinder after the valves close! The best classes you will find are delivered by Professor TDIWyse. Read through his "lectures" in this forum to get a fuller understanding (and appreciation) for all the dynamics involved in our fun little cars. |
Appreciate
1
|
04-20-2016, 08:48 AM | #8 |
Colonel
614
Rep 2,410
Posts |
I yield the indepth analysis of this area to DWR. He's posted some really great technical information on this...
__________________
2011 335d 11.68 @ 125.71 mph 1/4 mile NHRA certified track
Ram Cummins with lots-o-mods |
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 09:37 AM | #9 |
First Lieutenant
102
Rep 320
Posts |
Thanks for the correction, TDIwyse. I WAS thinking of his posts when I made that comment, although yours are generally at the same elevation. I have learned a lot from both of you, and enjoyed doing it.
DWR, I find you to be a thorough, articulate, and patient teacher (and student). I appreciate your sharing. My omission/mistake was unintentional. TDIwyse, I also appreciate your research, practical applications, and articulate sharing. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 08:23 PM | #10 | |
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 08:28 PM | #11 | |
865
Rep 642
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-20-2016, 10:21 PM | #14 | ||
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
Quote:
375 starts spraying at 18 psi and 675 at 24 psi...no quenching |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 05:47 AM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
102
Rep 320
Posts |
I'll let Bob, DWR, or one of the other experts report the exact number, but I'm betting that "top end pull" you talk about losing when meth is off is because of the 50-60 ponies you lose when the button is off.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 03:05 PM | #16 | |
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 04:48 PM | #17 |
Banned
798
Rep 1,633
Posts |
First, Chief believe what you are measuring. It is real.
Second, thanks for the kinds words. Third, QUIKDSL, no apology needed. Fourth, why does everyone thing TDIwyse and I look alike, lol? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 04:53 PM | #18 |
Colonel
614
Rep 2,410
Posts |
I haven't heard that one ... But I offer a hypothesis that it might be because we're both exceptionally handsome?
__________________
2011 335d 11.68 @ 125.71 mph 1/4 mile NHRA certified track
Ram Cummins with lots-o-mods |
Appreciate
0
|
04-21-2016, 11:19 PM | #19 |
Major
671
Rep 1,442
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Bookmarks |
|
|