09-25-2013, 08:51 AM | #1 |
Captain
343
Rep 686
Posts |
Adaptive vs. Passive Suspension
I've read a few comments happy to see/preferring M passive suspension, in the new M3/M4.
I was wondering the reason for this? Wouldn't adaptive sus be preferred, since the stiffest adaptive setting would be greater than even the passive suspension? |
09-25-2013, 09:36 AM | #2 |
Major General
890
Rep 9,031
Posts |
That's what they want you to think...
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 09:41 AM | #3 |
Major General
6359
Rep 6,569
Posts |
Honestly, some people don't like the "goldilocks" nature of adaptive suspensions. I've had them, and I get tired of switching modes. Maybe i've never had a good one.
Usually they are ruined by the softest mode needed. That mode dictates very soft springs, which then means the dampers are forced to work extra hard to control the car's motions. Usually, it's the dog's breakfast. Possible on this car that because whatever Comfort mode won't be all that comfortable, it'll actually work. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-25-2013, 09:44 AM | #4 |
Major
196
Rep 1,248
Posts |
^I think the 3-stage adaptive on the E9x models is great. I'll be speccing adaptive again, and hope the Comfort mode is similar as the softer suspension is the fastest setting on most roads as it absorbs midcorner bumps. I just leave this car in C, unless it's a track day.
On my E60 I also loved the system, expect that was a softer setup so my day to day was Normal and, as the N mode adapted automatically, I never used C or S in that car. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-26-2013, 10:33 PM | #5 |
Major
1030
Rep 1,190
Posts |
I'm a chassis engineer and I've tuned these types of suspensions on a couple cars at the OEM level. Sach's latest adaptive system on the F30's and E9X ZCP's are pretty good. The 3rd generation magneride on the ATS and C7 is comparable. A lot of the other technologies out there, including older versions of both of those, aren't that great. Too soft in comfort mode, too stiff in sport mode, and not very linear or natural feeling.
At the end of the day, any suspension technology is only as good as the guy who tunes it. A well tuned Semi-Active suspension is going to out-perform a well tuned passive system every time (considering OEM options only). I'd check the option box, no question. Edit: Since this is now linked to in a sticky, I should make some corrections here for clarity: 1. The F30 I drove did not, in fact, have the adaptive suspension. 2. Tenneco is the supplier of the F30 adaptive system, NOT Sachs. They are different systems with different performance capabilities. Last edited by Racer20; 04-15-2014 at 07:07 PM.. Reason: Corrected some info . . . |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 07:02 AM | #6 |
Moderator
7506
Rep 19,370
Posts |
Racer20, do you know details of how things have evolved and improved since the Exx M cars "EDC" (which I realize was not BMW's first active suspension offering, but it is the first one that many people here are likely to be familiar with) to today's Fxx generation "DDC". Also, how do today's M and non-M implementations differ? Are there distinguished hardware systems, or is it all in the software?
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 10:39 AM | #7 | |
Captain
343
Rep 686
Posts |
Quote:
It's nice to hear from an engineer that's worked on these systems. mkoesel, brings up some good questions. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 10:56 AM | #9 |
Major
113
Rep 1,470
Posts |
I only change modes on the track. The rest of the time it is on soft mode.
__________________
Stoptech 380mm/355mm | PFC08 / Pagid RS-29 | Akrapovic EVO - CF tips | Benvo Tune | MS UDP | AA air filter | MCS 2-way with 700/1000lb springs | Solid bushings and adjustable links | RD front swaybar | Apex EC-7 18x10 square 275/35-18 NT01 | Turner Race Studs | GT4 Brake Cooling | GT4 Power Steering Cooling | Alekshop Oil Cooler | Performance Steering Wheel | | CF Spoiler | Varis System 1 Full CF Diffuser | Extended Paddle Shifters | Schroth Quick Fit Pro | Turner Steering Rack Stops | Vorshlag Camber Plates
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 11:29 AM | #10 | |
Major General
3486
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
On the other hand the M6 has a decent system. Hopefully the F8x will have something similar to this. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 11:49 AM | #11 |
Lieutenant
37
Rep 582
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 12:01 PM | #12 |
Law Enforcer
24820
Rep 22,223
Posts
Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!
|
Almost always in Sport with the Power button engaged, but occasionally in Normal. Comfort was too soft for my tastes; I prefer a stiffer ride. I was also lowered on H&R Race springs, so the differences between the modes became more apparent.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 12:09 PM | #13 |
Major General
5457
Rep 7,037
Posts |
I had DDC on my F10 and didn't like:
- Flipping to sport mode every time the car was started. - Since the springs are passive they have to be tuned for the softest mode. - The electric dampers were not strong enough to overcome the weak springs. - The car felt under springed and overdamped in all modes except the softest. Now, this might just be in my head but I would think the springs and dampers can only be tuned to work optimally with each other in one setting. With passive dampers this is what all tuning has been spent on. Making sure the springs and dampers are optimally match to each other and to the car. I'm not checking the DDC box other than if in a test drive the softest modes feel better than the passive setup. Last edited by solstice; 09-27-2013 at 12:43 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-27-2013, 12:39 PM | #14 |
Major General
5243
Rep 5,874
Posts |
I love having ZCP with EDC. I'm in comfort 80% of the time on the road but will use both normal or sport on the road depending on the surface conditions and how aggressive I want to be. For track its sport setting. I think there is a noticeable difference and use for all three settings. It's subtle, but all 3 have their uses.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 12:51 PM | #15 | |
Major
1030
Rep 1,190
Posts |
Quote:
Your theory is a bit off . . . There's a lot of physics and engineering behind it, but passive dampers are ALWAYS a compromise. Adaptive dampers are one step closer to being able to optimize damping for any road condition and driving behavior. It's only in the past couple years that the hardware, software, AND tuning ability of the engineers has really synched up to allow these systems to perform better than a passive set up in all conditions. Last edited by Racer20; 09-28-2013 at 01:27 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 12:58 PM | #16 | |
Major General
3486
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
A magazine article revealed this after an interview with the BMW marketing team on the 4 series. If you look on the 4 series forum, you will see the article. It will feel fine on a billard table smooth track, add bumps or ripples and you will have to back off while the comfort mode car dives past. How Sporty is that? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 01:10 PM | #17 | |
Major
1030
Rep 1,190
Posts |
Quote:
Hardware: Triple tube dampers systems have a solenoid on the side that controls the damping pressure based on how much current is applied. The rebound to compression ratio (key to ride and handling performance) and min/max damping capability is determined by the passive valves in the damper, just like a normal shock. Double solenoid triple tubes have TWO solenoids on the outside of the damper to allow separate tuning for rebound and compression. This allows faster response and more tunability. Sachs newest system has the variable damping valve inside the shock absorber. I haven't seen one of these taken apart, but from what I understand they are very good. I would imaginee that the damping response time and hysteresis is better than an external solenoid system. Software One of the challenges that arises with these systems is making the car feel natural. You don't want to feel the damping changing as you're driving it, except for right when you change the modes. Tuning these systems involves a bunch of damping force maps and look up tables and "if X condition is detected, go to Y damping force table" type stuff, and getting all these different conditions and tables to blend well without jerking the car around is tough, and can be very time consuming. Newer tuning and control software is "smarter" and some of them may have more accurate vehicle models embedded in them, and make it easier to blend these modes together with less manual tuning of complex damping force tables. Vehicle The more sensors you have, the more accurately the suspension ECU knows what's going on, and the better it can control the dampers. Ideally, you'd have lazer height sensors reading the ground, accelerometers on the sprung and unsprung mass at all 4 corners, a yaw sensor, and accurate GPS (In addition to steering/throttle/brake sensors) but all these sensors are expensive. So normally you get a couple accelerometers and maybe a yaw sensor. That means the system has to derive the rest of the information it needs mathematically, and the result is less accurate and increases response time. The moral of the story is that these systems are very complex, and how it drives on one car has nothing to do with how it may drive on another. There is huge progress being made every year on this stuff, and there's really no question at this point that they ARE better than passive dampers in most respects. Last edited by Racer20; 04-15-2014 at 07:08 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 01:14 PM | #18 | |
Major General
3486
Rep 9,709
Posts |
Quote:
......the plain fact is....for a given car (sprung/unsprung mass, weight distribution, ARB stiffness, suspension design) there is ONE ideal compression and ONE rebound rate that works with a given Spring rate. Sure you can play around with fine adjustments (and I mean fine) to suit different drivers/conditions, but even these are generally REBOUND only, and also usually want to go softer rates So when you realise that BMW change both compression AND rebound on the F3x, and exaggerate the settings in such a way that the driver feels the big difference, that is not a well engineered solution. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 01:16 PM | #19 | |
Major
1030
Rep 1,190
Posts |
Quote:
Speed limiting has nothing to do with the suspension or suspension mode. It's also important to know what version of the F30 you're referring to and what tires were on it. The one I drove exhibited good body control, felt linear and natural, and was relatively plush. The tires had some impact noise, and the electric steering poorly tuned, but those are separate issues and not a function of the adaptive suspension. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 01:23 PM | #20 |
Moderator
7506
Rep 19,370
Posts |
Thanks for the reply Racer20. So like other car tech, it's evolving quickly, and they're getting it sorted pretty well. It will be interesting to see results if someone conducts an active vs. passive test for the F8x.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 01:25 PM | #21 | ||
Major
1030
Rep 1,190
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Dampers (even passive ones) are one of the most complex components on a vehicle. The information that is out there an available to consumers and racers (even things like the Penske tuning manual) is stuff that you learn the first day on the job as an OEM damper tuner, then throw out the next day because you realize it's kid stuff. Unless you've tuned shocks at either the OEM level or for an F1 team, you've only got about 5% of the picture. I'm not sure where this quote comes from, but it's most likely BS, either as an excuse or for some other reason. I've NEVER seen marketing dictate to chassis engineers how to tune a vehicle. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2013, 01:26 PM | #22 |
Major
1030
Rep 1,190
Posts |
Exactly. Electric power steering will be the same way.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|