Shows it adds ~114hp and ~98tq to the ground. Those are some impressive numbers.
Anyone running this or something similar and could share their thoughts?
https://bluesparkautomotive.com/bmw-x5-b58-2998cc-490ps-700nm-petrol-sent
xxx5phev wroteseveral have this on their 45e with favorable results. didn’t go crazy with it, just the first stage was enough to satisfy, and no reports of engine warranty issuesAnyone see the tuning module for the X5 50e that Bluespark Automotive came out with? See link below and theres also a dyno video.
Shows it adds ~114hp and ~98tq to the ground. Those are some impressive numbers.
Anyone running this or something similar and could share their thoughts?
https://bluesparkautomotive.com/bmw-x5-b58-2998cc-490ps-700nm-petrol-sent
Daveschally wroteAwesome, I'm looking forward to hearing how it is!So I’ve been in touch with these guys and decided to give them a try. I’ll have couple thousand miles by the time I install the module. Will keep this thread updated
Daveschally wroteI just ended up grabbing a JB4 for the gen 3 B58 off another member here on the forum. I'll let you know how it goes likely sometime next week when I have the time to install it.So I’ve been in touch with these guys and decided to give them a try. I’ll have couple thousand miles by the time I install the module. Will keep this thread updated
Daveschally wroteThe module is installed and test drive in map c was uneventful. Made a couple 0-60 runs and was at 4.01 and 3.96 but without the module did 10 runs with an average of 4.35 with my 2 best runs equaling the Bluespark runs. Obviously need more data and will update as appropriate. One area I can tell a difference is when in battery hold there is a torqueier feel at low rpm. There is no question aabout that.So I’ve been in touch with these guys and decided to give them a try. I’ll have couple thousand miles by the time I install the module. Will keep this thread updated
Daveschally wroteAwesome, thank you for the update! I posted a thread over on the general forum, but did you just disconnect the negative terminal on 12v battery under the trunk for the install? I have my JB4 in-hand and just want to make sure I properly depower the 12v system before I start disconnecting sensors.The module is installed and test drive in map c was uneventful. Made a couple 0-60 runs and was at 4.01 and 3.96 but without the module did 10 runs with an average of 4.35 with my 2 best runs equaling the Bluespark runs. Obviously need more data and will update as appropriate. One area I can tell a difference is when in battery hold there is a torqueier feel at low rpm. There is no question aabout that.
Also I have tried on all runs to make similar all the variables like temp, stretch of road wind and so on
SSIMPS wroteI did not however I kept my phone and key away from vehicle for 10 minutes and made sure the hood was opened prior to the 10 minute period so I didn’t wake up the idrive to get to the hood release. No issues at all.Awesome, thank you for the update! I posted a thread over on the general forum, but did you just disconnect the negative terminal on 12v battery under the trunk for the install? I have my JB4 in-hand and just want to make sure I properly depower the 12v system before I start disconnecting sensors.
Daveschally wroteSo went out again today for 3 more runs and adjusted tuner to Map D 7. Holy cow what a difference. I logged 3.25 3.46 and 3.96. The butt dyno is unmistakable. Scary quick this car is tuned. For the record I realize my 50e isn’t a 3.25 car as I use this app to judge differences in performance over stock. I will run a few more times but so far the average improvement looks to be .50 seconds quicker. There’s no question it’s quicker. What I might do next is try drained battery and place in battery hold and see what mostly ICE can do stock vs tune. Probably be easier on the tranny and the joints that way.

LDT wroteIf you follow the same logic, why did you get the M60i vs. the M40i? To each their own, but for some of us it's as simple as "because we can".I'm curious.....not judging......but if my car runs 0--60 half a second faster, what's the big deal??
LDT wrotePerhaps a Lexus RX will be your next car selection. Less dynamic but at least you get the .50 second slower vehicleI'm curious.....not judging......but if my car runs 0—60 half a second faster, what's the big deal??