Mikey240 wroteCARPRO makes some great products. You should check out their Perl and Darkside sealants for your tires.Yes sir! They will be giving me a few bottles of Car Pro products and one of them is the pH neutral car wash. They are also giving me a bottle of the top-off spray and then one other product as a care package type of thing.
Westside Guy wroteYep, this shop uses all Car Pro products & they give you a bunch of bottles of various stuff(soap, topper, etc.) as part of the service.CARPRO makes some great products. You should check out their Perl and Darkside sealants for your tires.
https://www.carpro-us.com/tire-trim-dressings-coatings/?_bc_fsnf=1&Surface=Rubber
Mikey240 wroteBack in the 90's I remember driving up from Manhattan to Cooperstown with my son to visit the Baseball Hall of Fame. I had the white 325i in this picture and the entire front of the car was plastered with dead bugs when I arrived.BTW - I asked them to quote me on adding PPF to JUST the front clip or bumper. Im reluctant but after a terrible day yesterday of bug shit and stuff on the front of the car, I feel I have to consider the extra protection for the front.
Westside Guy wroteThat car is a beauty! I owned a 1988 325is for many years. Great car, Ill have to dig up some pics.Back in the 90's I remember driving up from Manhattan to Cooperstown with my son to visit the Baseball Hall of Fame. I had the white 325i in this picture and the entire front of the car was plastered with dead bugs when I arrived.
The bumper, headlights, hood, A pillars, side mirror caps and the windshield were totally covered and it looked like I had a two tone car and it took forever to clean this bug shit off!
If it is within your budget, I would definitely protect the entire front of your car with PPF and instead of you paying the shop for ceramic buy a do it yourself ceramic coating.
Mikey240 wroteThe was a 1991 and my first BMW. I traded it in for a Samoa Blue 1994 325i cabriolet which I kept for 9 years. ❤️That car is a beauty! I owned a 1988 325is for many years. Great car, Ill have to dig up some pics.
Alan l. wroteThey quoted me an extra $550 for the front clip getting PPF. So, about $1500 for everything. Thats not too bad , IMO. I feel thats the part of the car that gets the brunt of the possible damage. Its simply too expensive to do the whole car or even the full front. I have to stop somewhere.1K while is a decent chunk of change its totally worth doing. I'm also a DIYer and i've done several cars myself doing the full process of decon, clay, polish then coating and my back would surely appreciate spending the money then standing there with a polisher for hours.
It all comes down to how perfect you want it to be and what is your car washing plans afterwards. If the car sees anything but two bucket self wash then i would say there is no point in chasing the perfect finish because all it takes is one bad wash to bring swirls right back. Its important to make sure the detailer knows what level of polishing you are expecting because that is where the bulk of your money should be going towards. Applying ceramic coating is easier than waxing a car nowadays. Its all in the prep work.
As for PPF I did it to my M5 Touring for the first time and i'm a believer now. The key is finding a good installer. No matter how careful i drive i use to always come back from road trips with some rock chips on the bumper or hood which annoys me. With PPF and nearly 3K miles later the car is still pristine. While you can 'see' ppf under some angles its still worth doing because i see rock chips way easier than ppf.
I paid 2500 for the full front clip. full hood, bumper, fenders, mirrors. I also ended doing the side skirts because those take a beating with summer tires no matter how you drive.
Alan
. Im going to go for it. The service includes a clay bar treatment and a "light", one step polish he said.
Mikey240 wroteEh, I'll disagree, but it's not a strong argument and in the end you should do what you want to do.As for washing & post-care, I am a big fan of waterless washes versus wet washes. My toy cars never really get that dirty - just front bug shit and the usual road grime/dust from driving. Really a perfect candidate for waterless washing. I feel like there are more chances for something going wrong with a full wet wash with mitts, drying, etc. versus careful & frequent waterless washes. We have horribly hard water here too so even drying a washed panel right away still leaves water spots. Its maddening, LOL.
tracer bullet wroteFair enough - and you might be right. I think the waterless option is really only for very lightly dirty cars "Lightly" being the keyword here. There is a fine line and if you cross it, yer gonna muck up the paint for sure. Ive checked my own work as in do a section waterless & then examine it under various lighting to look for any issues I might have just caused. So far, so good but there could be micro scratches, I guess. Ugh, this is so hard....Eh, I'll disagree, but it's not a strong argument and in the end you should do what you want to do.
I find waterless wash to effectively be "dusting" the car. I prefer to have water actually hit the surface of the car and take some of the dirt and etc. away from it. It's then wet, but is also "cleaner" to start with when you start to touch it with microfibers, which is something that you are still doing - just with a dirtier surface. As for drying, a leaf blower will get most of the water off. Then hit your microfiber with some waterless wash as you run around getting any drips you missed. I'd bet this is faster too, especially compared to using a cloth folded again and again to find a clean surface, and getting the little nooks and crannies everywhere.
Again, not saying your method is wrong. But there are a lot of options and you might have disregarded something equivalent or better.
.
. The leaf blower thing helps but then the nooks and crannies just release water that makes more spots. Just more work and I feel like I can screw up more. However, Im going to confirm with the shop what they recommend. I am open to trying different things. Alan l. wroteGotchya. As I replied to the other guy, maybe you're right. the water based washes just have so many more steps and conditions. And, when Im done I have to use a detail-wipe step to get rid of the damned water spots so there are microfiber towels still hitting the paint surface. Yes, its clean at that point but still.I’m not a fan of waterless washes. Much higher risk in scratching the paint. Unneeded risk if you have access to water/hose.
After years saying I’ll never spend that much for a pressure washer I finally got sick of replacing the $3-400 machines every two years and bought Kranzle. Wow there is a noticable difference and really changed the whole washing experience for me.
For a car that isn’t that dirty and mostly dusty a strong pressure washer rinse plus some Adam’s mega foam, let it sit for a few minutes and a rise could be enough already.
Alan
Alan l. 
tracer bullet
