bmw1racer wroteI only wanted opinions on the stuff that is listed. I don't what made folks have so much to say about what isn't.I think that's an extreme exaggeration, but that's the price you pay for asking for opinions...
tony20009 wroteOh... That wasn't clear to me.I only wanted opinions on the stuff that is listed.
bmw1racer wroteNPOh... That wasn't clear to me.
Sorry.
MandMs335Msport wroteThere're no winners or losers. I was just curious.I think I get it, but why is Timex listed? At any rate, it looks like Tag won!
Mark
i dunno wroteHow much can that be so? I already said I own a couple Tags myself.calm down people. op is just trying to troll tag fans.
tony20009 wroteI agree. I would gladly wear a nice citizen over a Tag any day. There is nothing special about them.I didn't, so, yes then, Tag has an original design. And I think their Grand Carrera watch is a bit unique. I don't have anything against Tag. As I said, I have a Tag, two actually. They are nice watches. I just didn't include them on the list. I don't see them as being at the forefront of design and style. It's nothing more than that.
Mr Tonka wroteI don't think there's much special about Tag either. They tell time well and they may appeal to folks visually. Certainly a couple did to me. But as I noted above, I wasn't aware of the Monaco, and it does have some measure of merit, both style wise and technologically. It doesn't appeal to me, but I have no issue with giving the Devil his due: it's a nifty watch. I don't know too much about it, but like belts on everything else, I suspect they will wear out, and do so sooner than the cogs that control other watches. That's just a supposition; I haven't any data showing whether that's actually what one should expect.I agree. I would gladly wear a nice citizen over a Tag any day. There is nothing special about them.
Just another opinion.
tony20009 wroteI don't really have any interest in fancy watches, but it definitely would've helped to make your intention clear from the beginning. At least change the title to "Curious about brands that I like the most" haha.Thanks all for your contributions apologies for not stating my intention at the outset. I really just wanted the votes.
I'm sure she'll really appreciate that!
i dunno wroteTY for your comments.I don't really have any interest in fancy watches, but it definitely would've helped to make your intention clear from the beginning. At least change the title to "Curious about brands that I like the most" haha.
Good luck with your daughter. I just googled Reverso, and those things cost more than all my personal apparel and accessories combined. Wow
i dunno wroteYes, nobody needs a $6K watch. Just as nobody needs a BMW. Both are indulgences. But at least one doesn't look out of place wearing one at Goldman. Strolling into the local DMV offices to give customers the next waiting ticket number wearing one would look a bit silly, though, IMO.I don't think anyone really needs a $6k watch. ...
MightyMouseTech wroteI just feel that public servants at that level should be a bit less flashy at work. I don't really want to think my tax dollars can afford one a $6K watch. I don't care if the person wearing it inherited it. It's just the perception.For their position?
Is the watch for them or just to impress others?
I wear a watch of similar caliber every day, and I am just a lowly mechanic. Guess I should be wearing a knock off instead?!?!
I bought it for me. I really don't care what others think about it.
tony20009 wroteI wasn't saying you shouldn't buy a $6k watch. Just wear what you like no matter how pedestrian or lavish it is. Whatever your job is, what other people think of your style shouldn't matter.Yes, nobody needs a $6K watch. Just as nobody needs a BMW. Both are indulgences. But at least one doesn't look out of place wearing one at Goldman. Strolling into the local DMV offices to give customers the next waiting ticket number wearing one would look a bit silly, though, IMO.
Mr Tonka wroteTag has a lot of history unlike Citizen. Not that Citizen doesn't have it's share of history and innovation (Eco Drive). Tag has had many innovations in the watch making world. Specifically in the automotive racing industry. Which if I am correct this is an automotive forum. I would think one would like anything that has to do with automotive history, like TAG Heuer. To often people forget that a watch used to be a necessity for individuals in certain industries. Hamilton is a good example of a company with history. Hamilton was a leader in an industry that time keeping was crucial. They played a huge role in the railroad system, and for you history nuts the railroad system was a huge factor in our time zones. When I'm looking into a watch company I look at the history that they have made and the innovations that have brought into the watch making.I agree. I would gladly wear a nice citizen over a Tag any day. There is nothing special about them.
Just another opinion.
