11-22-2024, 02:08 PM | #23 |
Power and Speed
105
Rep 2,197
Posts
Drives: ‘22 Shelby GT500, ‘25 X5 50e, '21 Tacoma TRD OR
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
|
@daveschally
Thank you for posting your data and findings. No doubt the 50e has some performance left on the table given the odd detuning from bmw. Any chance you have logged some 1/4 mile or 60-130 with stock vs the device? The later might be difficult if I’m remembering correctly that they limit these cars to 130 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-02-2024, 06:29 AM | #25 |
Second Lieutenant
143
Rep 255
Posts
Drives: BMW X5 2025 50e
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Georgia
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-06-2025, 04:30 PM | #26 |
Second Lieutenant
143
Rep 255
Posts
Drives: BMW X5 2025 50e
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Georgia
|
Last week I took my tuning module off and plugged in as stock and tested. In summary, I found a .38 average improvement in the 0-60 times and .47 improvement in 30-80mph times while plugged into the tuning box vs stock. I have no idea what dyno results would be
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-14-2025, 12:58 PM | #27 |
Registered
0
Rep 1
Posts |
I've had the bluespark tuning module in my 2025 X5 50e for about a week now. I have it on the default "C" setting and the difference in driving experience is quite stark. The car is much more responsive and acceleration seems to come effortlessly. Engine runs very smoothly overall the car is a pleasure to drive. Honestly I feel like this is how the stock tuning should have been to begin with.
I'll try the higher settings once I have the recommended 200 miles on the C setting. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-03-2025, 05:57 AM | #28 | |
Second Lieutenant
143
Rep 255
Posts
Drives: BMW X5 2025 50e
Join Date: Jun 2024
Location: Georgia
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|